Monday, March 24, 2008

Why Homeschooling Matters...

In the news recently was a story reporting the declarations of a California Supreme Court Justice: "Parents do not have a constitutional right to homeschool their children." Homeschoolers across the nation cringed and felt sick upon hearing those words repeated in the news over the next few weeks. And it begs the question:

What right does the government, state or federal, have to legislate how we teach our children?

Public schools are meant as one option for educating children, but in recent decades, greedy school districts, hungry for larger enrollment and indignant that an increasing number of families are choosing homeschool, have set out on witch hunts for "bad" homeschoolers who can be made examples for the rest through the justice system.

A young homeschooled boy riding his bicycle to his grandmother's house during public school hours on his own spring break was ticketed for truancy, despite his mother confirming that he was on spring break and on the way to his grandmother's house.

This is just one example of how stricter truancy laws are being used to catch NOT delinquents, but homeschoolers! Sneaky, huh? Didn't see it coming, did you?

The truth is that there are those working in the public school system, entrenched in the establishment, who would do anything to keep their way of life intact amid a changing educational scene. While standardized test scores plummet and school shootings continue to rise, private schools rise up across the nation, some merely umbrella schools for homeschoolers with curricula for sale that parents can teach in their own homes. It's enough to make any self-respecting school board member incited to anger. How dare they pull their kids out of the public school system when we're paid per student in enrollment. They're depriving poor kids of excellent art and sports programs, new computers, etc. How can they even afford private schooling when we're taxing them for schools using the property tax?!

The truth is that everything the system is doing is underhanded and over the heads of the citizens they are supposed to serve. "The ends justify the means" is their motto. Taxing people through the property tax whether their kids attend public schools or not is just one example.

Why are they so underhanded? Because the truth is that the work they are so busy doing involves taking away basic American rights, and to do it blatantly would stir an uprising. So they do it carefully and slowly, over decades. They declare an education crisis and ask for an increased budget, more (quantity, not quality) standardized tests, and better laws to ensure kids GO to school.

All the while, increased bureaucracy cumbers the educational process so that instead of learning, the kids are busy taking tests for a week at a time. Instead of learning academia, the kids are pulled into auditoriums and gymnasiums to be taught "sex education," "physical education," now "parenting education." Odds are that anything with the word "education" attached to it is something the government shouldn't be teaching your child.

(see http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/)

Then they lament that math and science are not being taught well enough. Where is the time to teach math, science, history, and reading, when children are being taught how to use condoms, run laps around the gym, and what the government thinks makes good parents, not to mention the time siphoned away for standardized testing. Ask any teacher and they will tell you that they wish they had more time to teach their subject.

The fact is that the public school system is becoming so socialist in nature that it is losing its focus on children at all. 'Sacrifice the single child for the good of the whole class' is becoming the accepted creed. Without individual attention and tutoring, children are graduating from public high schools with huge gaps in their knowledge of history, science, and even the basics of English grammar. No wonder communication is a problem in families and workplaces.

As a result of this failure to teach, concerned parents are pulling their children en masse from the established system either to reinsert them into private schools with better teacher-to-student ratios or to teach them at home on their own.

This trend is a natural response to a deteriorating system, especially in a democratic and capitalistic society such as ours. Competition is good, remember? So why are some people's panties in a twist over something so natural and good?

Well, that's easy to answer. Remember the words to "Three Blind Mice?" It's a popular folk song here in America and here are the lyrics that I learned as a child:

"Three blind mice
Three blind mice
See how they run
See how they run
They all run after the farmer's wife
Who cut off their tails with a carving knife
Have you ever seen such a sight in your life
As three blind mice?!"

The other day, a toddler songs cd that I bought for my son was playing in the living room while my sister was over with her baby. When "Three Blind Mice" came on, she was appalled that they had changed the words to:

"They all ran after the farmer's wife/Who never had been so smitten with strife"

Why should she care that a few words had been changed from this inconsequential folk song? She cares because it challenges her memory of the status quo; it changes things from the way she is used to them being. It changes things. People, as a rule, do not like change, even if it's a single line in an old child's song.

Multiply that by a thousand and you get public school workers' feelings about education in America changing as dramatically as it has been in recent years. In their minds, something must be done to get things back to the way they were.

The problem is this: In order to regain the status quo, the government must intervene in the private lives of ALL of its citizens. They must declare once and for all that parents are NOT in charge of the children God gave them to raise and to care for. They must assert that the government, in fact, owns every child and has a say in what those children are taught, by whom they are taught, and when they are taught it. They must ridiculously say, as that justice from California did, that parents have no constitutional right to homeschool their children.

But watch out to those of you unconcerned with this issue because you are not a homeschooler, or because you have no children of your own. Each right taken from us is a stepping stone to a socialist society... one where what YOU read is censored and monitored, one where children (yours and mine) are taught only the propoganda of the time and not schooled in the classic academia of math, science, history, and reading, except to the level that they can read government propoganda.

Our government is structured well with many checks and balances. We enjoy many freedoms that God has given us which our government has wisely left in our hands to this point.

But what happens when those handling both the checks and the balances become corrupted and self-interested? What happens when they decide that maintenance of government authority in education is more important than personal choice and learning?

I am not an alarmist, but a realist. And I see the socialist trends in a once free land. I have to point them out to others before the freedom to blog is taken as well.

Why does homeschooling matter? It's a type and a shadow of things to come. When our children are left to bureaucrats to raise, it's time to speak up. Please, write your congressmen and congresswomen, not a form letter, but a genuine letter of concern from an informed constituent. One voice can be ignored, but thousands cannot.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Easter, War for Will, and the Miracle of Green

It's mid-march and Easter is just a few days away. That's so strange! Easter is supposed to be in April. Is there a reason they've changed the date? It makes more sense in April with all its springtime splendor. Not to mention historical accuracy. Perhaps it's just part of the continued plot to throw Christians off their own ship. I think more people think favorably of the Muslim religion than they do of the Christian religion lately. I wonder if the news media has anything to do with that? That's not really a question. Most disturbing are the reports that teachers in public schools, especially in history and science classes are teaching that religion (read Christian religion) has been the cause of most of the wars and massacres of history and mocks science and logical thought. Great things for our Christian children to be hearing from those who are supposed to be guiding them through academic curricula. Chalk one more up to homeschooling.

The truth is that Phillip Pullman is right (author of the Golden Compass trilogy). There is a war coming, whether we want it or not. And it is a war for free will. The awful thing is that we've already had this war... a long time ago. And free will won out. Why are evil people still trying to take that away from each other? True diversity means free will.

Well, those are just things I've been thinking about lately. I added some more plants to my windowbox herb garden: parsley, sage, basil, chives, catnip, lemon balm and cilantro. I know catnip isn't exactly a culinary herb, but that's okay. It helps with lowering fevers and lessening teething pain for children. I think that's pretty darn cool. I've been studying herbs off and on since college, but recently I've been reading Rosemary Gladstar, who is a famous herbalist. I just love her writing! She makes some great points about teaching our children about the usefulness of plants. It's so important for them to respect and seek out nature. After all, the drugs and chemicals modern medicine use are ALL derived from plants. Thinking about that makes it so much easier to give thanks in ALL things to God. All things really do come from God and without him is not anything made that is made. I love knowing that; it means He loves us that much, to give us all the things our bodies need. It's too perfect not to be God.

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Purpose of this blog

The original purpose of this blog, though it may change, is to communicate my feelings and process about my book-writing efforts.

Throughout my life, I have been a creative soul: often dramatic, but always passionate. This is a writer's diary-- a place to let my writing career evolve and develop, I hope, into a verile, fruit-bearing tree... preferrably pink grapefruit. I love pink grapefruit.

First, I want to express my disappointment with the over-mechanization of novel-writing that occurs first in the public schools when well-meaning teachers insist that young writers conform to a series of rules, some of which are ridiculous... like delineating which tense we all should write in, and that you should never end a phrase with a preposition as I just did. In truth and in life, we all communicate imperfectly and I think we all enjoy reading thoughts that share this degree of imperfection. In my writing, I strive for accuracy in mechanics, grammar, punctuation, etc., but I have all but given up many of the other rules I have been taught for writing good essays and fiction. For example, some people would have you believe that you can never use the helping verb "had" or "have" in your writing, because it is cumbersome (or for whatever reason). Or they will tell you to limit your descriptive adjectives until your sentences are streamlined steam engines that get straight to the point without meandering at all. How awful! What if Robert Frost wrote like that?

Over-mechanization of novel-writing will claim me as its constipated victim no longer! I will write according to the rules I have learned, only insofar as it sounds and feels good! I know, that's so bold and brash, but it must be said by me if I'm to continue in this journey. I will write freely and I will revise conscientiously. But (yes, I started with that word on purpose) I will not revise my work to match the trends of today's popular fiction or non-fiction. I do not want my books to have the same trendy covers and titles that I see on the shelves at the bookstore. I prefer them to resemble the classics I find in the library. And what I have learned from the writers of yesteryear is that great writing can be done in my own style, even breaking a rule or two here and there. Even using "trite" expressions appropriately can serve a purpose in great writing. And so I declare my independence from over-mechanized writing and say, "Leave me be!" to the great critics of the world who are great only for criticizing those who are truly great.

And thus begins my blog. Most of it won't be this self-righteous-sounding, I hope. :-)